Home Welcome Resource Center Bookstore

Svenska

Norsk Deutsch Espańol
               

 

MORE ABOUT THE 2008 ELECTION IN THE U.S.

By John S. Torell

 

In the previous newsletter I identified the mysterious corporation as the World Government and its different departments at the top. I also want to share with you how the different candidates running for the presidency are not private individuals expressing personal policies but merely a member of a team that is propelling them along. Let me give you an illustration of what I mean.

NASCAR RACING

It is impossible for a young man or woman, to go out and buy a race car, and then show up at a NASCAR race and compete in the race. There are a number of steps which first must be taken by a hopeful driver.

The person has to attend some kind of driving school that specializes in racing. Since racing is a very costly sport, the driver must be a multi-millionaire or be good enough that they are hired by a corporation who will sponsor them. In return, the race car will be decorated with the corporation’s logo and name, including the helmet and clothing the driver is going to wear in the race. Once the person has gotten this far, they must compete in qualification races, where they must be able to maintain a top speed and end up in the top section of the drivers seeking qualification. Once the NASCAR association has accepted him, he is now allowed to participate in a series of racing events, which will determine who will be the national champion of the year.

At the race, the driver will have a team working with him. The pit crew will change tires and fill up the tank make repairs or mechanical adjustments. The manager will be in contact with the driver via radio and give him instructions who is behind him, when is the best time to pull in for a pit stop, etc. The car and driver are the main attraction for fans not the pit crew, but without a pit crew, it would be difficult to win a race. The driver is elevated to stardom because of the success of his pit crew.

POLITICAL ELECTIONS

A political candidate must have a sponsor in order to be a serious contender in any type of elections in the United States. The Democratic and Republican parties are the only powerhouse sponsors right now. Most people don’t know that the two political parties are run like the Mafia where you have to have money and connections to get in. It definitely helps to be a Freemason. Everybody starts at the bottom with the prospective candidate licking the boots of the party bosses and their underlings.

Candidate nominations for an office are determined by a small group of people in what has been described as wheeling and dealing in smoke-filled back rooms. Thus the general public does not really have a chance to elect a person of their choice; they are simply told these are the candidates, vote for the ones we have provided. If an individual makes a decision to run for an office independently, he must personally pay for the filing and finance his own campaign. Since the media is “in bed” with the Democrats and Republicans, private candidates will only receive negative media coverage, but most of the time they won’t even be mentioned by the media. Do you remember George Wallace, Ross Perot and Ralph Nader running for the presidency? All three men were slaughtered by the media and never had a chance to really present their viewpoints to the public.

QUALIFYING RACES

In politics they have qualifying races called “primaries.” In order to qualify in the primaries, each party will only take a certain number of applications. Each hopeful candidate must pass certain tests:

  • Be in good standing with local party bosses.

  • Be certified by the American Jewish leadership as supporters of Israel.

  • Be approved by the homosexual lobby and tolerant of people committing adultery and fornication.

  • Accept all religions as equal.

No candidate will be allowed in the race if he is a strong fundamental Bible believing Christian. Mike Huckabee was considered as a liberal Christian who was allowed to run in the qualifying races. He was supported by Rick Warren and the Purpose Driven churches. Since the Republican Party is doomed to lose if they do not cater to the religious right, they had no choice but to allow someone who could sooth the Christians. The Republican Party has never liked Ron Paul, but since he had strong local support and was already a Congressman, he was allowed to run. The Republican Party counted on the big media to shut him out, which is exactly what happened.

THE SEMI FINALS

John McCain became the frontrunner in the Republican qualifying race and made it to the semi finals. All the other drivers were told to either get out of the race or be shunned. Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul refused to give up; how much have you heard about them lately?

In the Democratic race, two drivers remain and neither has been able to obtain a sufficient lead. This race will be decided in the smoke-filled back rooms at the Democratic Convention as party bosses will fight behind the scenes and then tell the super delegates how to tip the race. There will be a tremendous pressure put on Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to toe the line and accept the verdict of who will be the winner and not be a spoiler in the fall election.

THE FINALS

Two drivers will be allowed to race against each other. Each driver has an un-American team controlling the driver. Let’s take a look at the teams and see who the people are behind the scenes. Remember, in the fall election, it is the team that is elected, not the driver; furthermore, it is the team that will occupy the White House and tell the winning driver what to do for the next four years.

JOHN McCAIN

John McCain’s chief handler is no less than Henry Kissinger himself, a German born Jew, a member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission and the Bilderburger group. Kissinger is high up on the rungs of the World Government and is known as “Dr. Death” in some nations since he has told political leaders over the years to line up or face execution.

  1. Indira Ghandi, the Prime Minister of India was murdered by her own bodyguards on October 31, 1984.

  2. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, started Pakistan on its road to a nuclear bomb. Since he did not toe the line according to the Jewish World Government, Pakistani operatives stirred up trouble; he was indicted for corruption, found guilty and hanged on April 4, 1979. His daughter Benazir Bhutto did not fare much better and was murdered on December 27, 2007.

  3. The Swedish/Jewish Prime Minister Olof Palme fell from grace with the World Government and was gunned down on a street in Stockholm February 28, 1986.

Here are the rest of McCain’s handlers:

  • Colin Powell, former Secretary of State under George W. Bush, CFR

  • Alexander Haig, former Secretary of State under Ronald Reagan, CFR

  • James Woolsey, former director of CIA from 1993-95, CFR

  • Brent Scowcroft, vice chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc., CFR

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

The chief handler for Obama is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a heavyweight in the World Government. He was the co-founder with David Rockefeller of the Trilateral Commission (TC) in July 1973. It was Brzezinski who befriended Jimmy Carter when he was Governor of Georgia and pushed him as the candidate for the Democratic Party. Carter, just like Obama, was an unknown person at that time to the American people. Brzezinski became the National Security Advisor to President Carter and was the driving force of the United States severing diplomatic ties with Taiwan, signing of the SALT II treaty with the Soviet Union and started the process of giving away the Panama Canal, eventually finalized in 1999.

Here are the rest of Obama’s handlers:

  • Sarah Sewall, Rhodes Scholar, former member of the Clinton administration and a member of CFR

  • Susan Rice, CFR

  • Joseph Cirincione, CFR

  • Lawrence Korb, CFR

  • General Merrill McPaek, CFR

  • Dennis Ross, CFR

  • Jay Rockefeller, CFR and TC

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

The chief handler for Hillary Clinton is the American Jewess Madeleine Albright. She happens to sit on the Board of Directors of the CFR. She was a staff member of the Carter administration and served on the National Security Council from 1976-1981. She was appointed as an ambassador to the United Nations by Bill Clinton in 1993 and then served as Secretary of State in the Clinton administration from 1997-2001.

Here are the rest of Clinton’s handlers:

  • Richard Holbrooke, former UN ambassador 1999-2001, CFR

  • Sandy Berger, an American Jew and National Security Advisor for Bill Clinton 1997-2001, CFR

It is important for the public to know, that on September 8, 2005, Berger was sentenced in a Federal Court for having illegally removed highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroyed some of them to cover up illegal dealings with the Israeli government. Berger used his security clearance to sanitize records when an investigation was started into allegations of Israeli spying on the U.S. government. You might want to ask yourself, why hasn’t the media discussed this crime?

  • General Wesley Kanne Clark, Rhodes Scholar, Supreme Allied Commander of NATO from 1997-2000, CFR

  • Nelson Strobridge Talbott III, Rhodes Scholar, President of the Brookings Institution, CFR

  • John M. Keane, CFR

  • Kenneth Pollack, CFR

  • Michael O’Hanlon, CFR

RON PAUL

Ron Paul is not a certified driver since he has rejected the establishment. There were no CFR handlers on his team and the media shunned him.

BACK TO THE CORPORATION

In principle, the highest branch of the World Government which we are calling “The Corporation,” is controlling events in the United States from three departments.

 The oldest of them is The Federal Reserve Banks (FRB) consisting of 12 privately owned banks. The Federal Reserve Act was passed into law by Congress in December 1913. It has a governing board and its chairman is appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. This is what is known as the Central Bank of the United States, controlling the printing and flow of money, setting interest rates, etc. It is a private corporation and has nothing to do with the federal government. Once the chairman has been appointed and confirmed, neither the president nor the Senate can remove him from power. With the current housing crisis, legislation will be enacted this year to give the FRB additional power of the American economy through control over the mortgage industry. This will be presented to the American people as protection from “meltdowns in the future.” Thus the World Government is in total control of all financial development and transactions in the United States.

The next department is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), founded in New York on July 29, 1921. The 13 ruling men in the Corporation dictate political developments, which are then given to the CFR, which in turn informs its membership what has to be done in the future.

In 1973 the Corporation decided it needed another department to carry out its political agenda in the United States and The Trilateral Commission was founded (TC)

In order to have more control over foreign governments, the Corporation ordered the CFR to create an international department. This was done in 1954 and became known as the Bilderberger Group.

In addition to these departments, there are a number of so-called “think tanks,” one of which is the Brookings Institute. The Corporation needs to educate young people to their way of thinking, so the Rhodes Scholarship was created. This is where young college students are handpicked and sent to University of Oxford in England for indoctrination. Bill Clinton was a recipient of the scholarship.

THE PRESIDENTIAL TEAMS

I hope you have understood that the handlers for the presidential candidates are all members of one of these departments; their job is to make sure that the policies of the World Government will be carried out regardless of the candidate’s political party.

Ironically, even if the handlers are from the same organization and are told to carry out the same policies, there is still rivalry between the teams. At stake are high salaries, bonus payments, power and prestige. The American people are oblivious to what is going on behind the scenes and they think that each candidate is their own person, when in reality they are a controlled agent. The Corporation doesn’t really care who wins the election as long as their policies are carried out.

NANCY PELOSI IS NOT HAPPY

During the California State Democratic Convention in San Jose during the month of March, 2008, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi complained about the bickering between Hillary and Obama. Pelosi said that she will not back down even though she is under pressure from wealthy party donors on her insistence that the Democratic Party must select a presidential nominee based on the results of state primaries and caucuses, not on the whim of the party’s super delegates.

Prior to this on an interview with ABC news on March 16, Pelosi said that the nominee should be selected based on the overall delegate winner in state primaries and caucuses. In a direct quote she said, “If the votes of the super delegates overturn what’s happened in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic Party.”

Pelosi is not worried about the fate of the Democratic Party; rather she is concerned about her ability to hang on the post as the House Speaker. If the Obama team loses, most of their supporters will sit out the fall election in anger. That would hand the Republicans a victory and the House of Representatives could once again go back to the GOP. Since most democrats now are beginning to believe that Obama is their best chance, support for Hillary Clinton is decreasing.

This has made Hillary and her team angry. Twenty wealthy Clinton supporters and fundraisers sent a letter to Pelosi, warning her against making such declarative statements. Clinton’s money buddies read like who’s who among the elite, restless and wealthy Americans. Why are they concerned? Well, if Hillary is not elected president, they won’t be able to line their pockets with more money, not to mention about being invited to the White House for state dinners and other extravagant events.

The rich and the famous, aspiring politicians and established politicians are in a terrible dilemma, they need to choose between Hillary and Obama. The people on the bandwagon for the loser will be treated like dirt by the winners. This is where the contest is real and nasty and where real blood is drawn. There is no way anybody can support both candidates; it’s all about choosing one or the other.

WHAT ABOUT THE JEWISH QUESTION?

This is something no candidate can avoid, if they want to be elected, they must toe the line as prescribed by The Corporation. In closing, I want to quote an article written by Aaron Klein, and published by WorldNetDaily on March 25, 2008:

Top Obama adviser:
NYC, Miami Jews ‘the problem’

Also compares Muslim terrorists to religious ‘radicals’ in Oregon

JERUSALEM – Sen. Barack Obama’s military adviser and national campaign co-chairman has implied U.S. politicians are afraid of Jewish voters in Miami and New York City and that American Jews are the “problem” impeding a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Merrill A. McPeak, a former Air Force chief of staff, also compared the Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist organizations to what he described as religious radicals in Oregon and claimed “born-again [Christians]” supported the war in Iraq to help Israel.

Discussing Middle East politics during a 2003 interview with the Oregonian newspaper McPeak stated, “We don’t have a playbook for the Middle East. You know, for instance, obviously, a part of that long-term strategy would be getting the Israelis and the Palestinians together at . . .something other than a peace process. Process is not a substitute for achievement or settlement. And even so the process has gone off the tracks, but the process isn’t enough.”

The Oregonian interviewer asked McPeak whether the problem in solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict originated with the White House or the State Department.

“So where’s the problem?” the interviewer asked.

McPeak replied, “New York City. Miami. We have a large vote – vote, here in favor of Israel. And no politician wants to run against it.”

McPeak went on to insist that to solve the conflict, Israelis must “stop settling the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and maybe even withdraw some of the settlements that’ve already been put there. And nobody wants to take on that problem. It’s just too tough politically.”

McPeak did not point to Palestinian terrorism or the recent election of Hamas to power as problems impeding an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal.

As a follow-up question, the Oregonian interviewer asked McPeak whether “there’s an element within Hamas, Hezbollah, that doesn’t want Israel to exist at all and always will be there?”

McPeak responded by comparing the two terror groups to “radical” Oregonians.

“There’s an element in Oregon, you know, that’s always going to be radical in some pernicious way, and likely to clothe it in religious garments, so it makes it harder to attack. So there’s craziness all over the place.”

McPeak said there was “some” good will toward peace on the Israeli side, but qualified, “that’s maybe the more cosmopolitan, liberal version of the Israeli population – I think there’s enough good will there.

“I don’t know if there is still on the Palestinian side, because they’ve been radicalized pretty well,” McPeak said.

The McPeak interview circulated on several large blogs yesterday, including the popular Powerline blog, after it was first pointed out in the American Spectator online magazine by Robert Goldberg, a writer and vice president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest.

Interpreting the identity of voters in Miami and NYC McPeak had referred to, Goldberg stated: “Translation (as if it’s needed): Jews – who put Israel over every American interest – control America’s policy on the Middle East.”

Goldberg also pointed out McPeak once claimed Christian Zionists were driving America’s policy in Iraq to benefit Israel.

Stated McPeak while discussing the Iraq war: “Let’s say that one of your abiding concerns is the security of Israel as opposed to a purely American self-interest, then it would make sense to build a dozen or so bases in Iraq. Let’s say you are a born-again Christian and you think that Armageddon and the rapture are about to happen any minute and what you want to do is retrace steps you think are laid out in Revelations, then it makes sense . So there are a number of scenarios here that could lead you in this direction. This is radical....”

McPeak is the latest Obama adviser to be highlighted for controversial views regarding Israel.

WND recently quoted Israeli security officials who expressed “concern” about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group

Also Samantha Power, who was described as Obama’s closest adviser until she resigned earlier this month after making strong remarks against Sen. Hillary Clinton, advocated in an interview investing “billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the state of Palestine.”

Stated Goldberg: “Obama has a Jewish problem and McPeak’s bigoted views are emblematic of what they are. Obama can issue all the boilerplate statements supporting Israel’s right to defend itself he wants. But until he accepts responsibility for allowing people like McPeak so close to his quest for the presidency, Obama’s sincerity and judgment will remain open questions.”

 

Volume 4, 2008